Currently browsing Movies

Hollywood movies, plots and scenes from a mathematician's point of view. Fun read. (September 13th, 2009, 0)

Uncomfortable plot summaries

August 20th, 2009 0 comment(s) 

Uncomfortable, sometimes funny, and politically incorrect plot summaries of popular movies.

my favorites:

300: Gays kill blacks.

BLADE: Obsessed loner stalks minority group.

STAR WARS: A NEW HOPE: Religious extremist terrorists destroy government installation, killing thousands.

STAR WARS: EMPIRE STRIKES BACK: Boy is abused by midget, kisses sister, attempts patricide.

TERMINATOR: An unplanned pregnancy leads to complications.

THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST: Mel Gibson fulfills fantasy of showing a Jew beaten to a bloody pulp and killed on-screen.

ROCKY: White man beats black man.

(via kottke.org)

Harry/Luke/Neo

July 1st, 2009 0 comment(s) 

Harry Potter, Neo and Luke Skywalker are one and the same. Quite obvious, of you read this!

The theme they all follow is called “monomyth” (via Kottke.org).

Stallone!!

July 1st, 2009 0 comment(s) 

Have you ever thought of who would act in the MOTHER OF ALL ACTION FILMS?!?

Think no further! Look!!!

Sly is apparently also working on Rambo V (rescuing a grandma trapped in an old people’s home from the clutches of a senile south american dictator?) and death wish (kill me please?)!!

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1137450/

The VD code - seriously.

May 22nd, 2006 6 comment(s) 

I’d found the book a fun read. The movie was a step down, it felt hollow, cheesy and full of clichees. I got to thinking while watching it, and naturally, I got to thinking about religion.

As usual, I came out with the conviction that religion is a farce. Not that my belief (or lack thereof) is based on a movie, or a work of fiction, but rather, on my faith in humans and their ability to form logical connections, as well as their worse talents; manipulating the ignorant masses. I’ve wasted a lot of breath on this topic, but whatever.
Christianity , let alone Islam, are merely ways to control those masses. A god wouldn’t be so needy as to request devotion from “mere humans”. On the other hand, were that the case, then there is absolutely no reason for prophets and scriptures to be a one time thing. Temptation? Testing? The search for truth, resisiting, playing hard to get? What is this, my girlfriend?!
The church categorically refuses change. Texts such as Thomas’ or Judas’ gospel, as well as others, are rejected simply because they might offer insight into new faces of J.C., and might endanger the hard-wired rules which the church uses to rule with an iron fist.

The bible’s rigidity is, in and of itself, a testament to the fact that religion is not the answer. Let’s put it this way: selective religion is pathetic. It’s a way for the weak to attach themselves to something higher, more mystical and more powerful, and to hope for life after death.

If you believe, you believe it all. That would mean that you’d have to live in previous millenia. An omniscient god, transmitting his teachings to us, would have taken progress into consideration. Or, he would send a Jesus 2.0 into the world for an update. The lack of such a thing simply supports that this whole thing is a farce. God, knowing that we are “smart” creatures, would have taken such a thing into consideration.

There are no half-measures, it’s all or nothing. The all is unconvincing. So it’s the nothing.

The movie is ridiculous, by the way. I hated casting Tom Hanks in the starring role from the start. The deep analysis and details of the book are smudged in the movie. The story is rendered into a simple ‘fun’ adventure/thriller. Bah.

Mass movie review: Bahs

March 16th, 2006 0 comment(s) 

Syriana: Syriana sucks. A very lame attempt at making a mind-blowing political thriller…. all it does is present some cheap cliches and over-simplify everything by making it all part of a complicated plot. Not recommended. Although, seeing George Clooney like that is fun.

Underworld: The only reason I went is for a fun time, and hot vampire chick in latex. The movie is a pop-corn flick, give it that, but there was too little latex, too few hot vampire chicks and the action wasn’t that remarkable. The first was better. Watch it only if you’re bored.

Million dollar baby: Clint Eastwood is an overrated actor, in my opinion. He’s an Ok director, and the movie is sad, to say the least, but it had a LOT of potential, and it didn’t really live up to what it could have been… clint mumbles a lot… it pisses me off. Watchable, but not up to the hype.

Rules of attraction: A little cheesy flick that tries too hard to be a cult hit. Don’t watch this. Shallow characters, silly plot(s), stupid college kids (I can call them that, now ;) ). One main character walks around with a bottle of Jack in coat pocket… that was cool.

Igby goes down: The only cool things about this movie was that Kieran Culkin can act circles around his big brother, Jeff Goldblum plays his role marvelously, and Claire Danes is one of the few blonde (the curls…. roar) actresses that I have ever found attractive. Other than that, nah…. don’t bother watching it.

Jarhead

February 12th, 2006 2 comment(s) 

I’m not a fan of anti-war movie per se… I’m not a fan of the whole anti-war movement, actually. I must say, however, that Jarhead is a great movie.

It’s a fascinating dissection of the military psyche. The movie doesn’t come through as a “blockbuster”. It’s rather a quasi-indie with more depth than action, and more inner-reflection than special effects. Some of the scenes left me shivering with rage, or nodding In agreement. I have never used a combat weapon, but I could almost taste the protagonist’s fascination, anticipation, and disappointment in various phases.

It goes beyond war, and becomes more of a study in passion and dissillusionment.
It’s a well thought out movie with nice cinematography and good acting. Definitely recommended.

Somewhere out there, someone is playing the world’s smallest violin just for me

November 18th, 2005 0 comment(s) 

She could have been my Wendy.

Because it says so in the movies…

October 3rd, 2005 6 comment(s) 

Apparently, hollywood is to blame for the rise in STD and unwanted pregnancies. Hollywood movies seem to promote unsafe sex without warning/mentioning the consequences. The article specifically mentions James Bond and Basic Instict. I mean… COME ON!

They wouldn’t be called movies otherwise… they would be called 80-million-dollar-awareness clips. I can just picture it. James Bond sipping on an alcohol-free martini and watching his out-of-wedlock children, in between stopping a plot to evaporate the pacific ocean, and another to blow up uranus. Then talking about how he regrets sleeping with every single sex-bomb from Ursula Andress to Halle Berry. I would do that. The world needs to know.

Or, Sharon Stone, moving from the standard missionary to a more entertaining tribadism, pausing and telling us all how, if we concentrate on that infamous split second where she crosses her legs we could see the herpes she contracted from unsafe sex. (I should mention that she was being interrogated for stabbing numerous men with icepicks… but that’s not important… murder isn’t bad, sex is)

Yes, there should be disclaimers all over the movies. People are stupid. Superman should warn us not to try to fly before he takes off, and after he lands. For that matter, Santa should tell everyone he’s not real, and Jesus should note that turning 5 fish into 5000 was a special effect, and that we shouldn’t try to walk on water, or crucify people, because, in real life, they DO die.

I’m all worked up, damn it.

[Edit: BBC is also running this story... must be a slow news day, no hurricanes or fuckheads blowing themselves up]

Silver Screen x3

July 2nd, 2005 0 comment(s) 

Three movies, briefly.

The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy: Sucks. The book is hilarious. The movie fails. The voiceover says it all. When you need to read sections of the book, in the movie, it’s a failure. For someone who hasn’t read the book, the movie wouldn’t make lots of sense, the plot isn’t coherent, and the characters aren’t well-developed. The effects leave a lot to be desired. The book is a rich witty, colorful work, the movie barely scrapes the surface.

Batman Begins: Surprisingly good. I went in with low expectations, too many bad batman movies for me to hope for anything good. The acting was good, the effects were fun, and I loved the way the story delved into Bruce Wayne’s character… it’s dark, grim, (necro :), and very believable, sort of. It’s no Gone With The Wind, but for an action film, it’s pretty good.

The War Of The Worlds: Great. Seriously. I don’t like the book, apart from it being avant-garde, there’s not a whole lot to it. The movie, on the other hand, was pretty good. It veered away enough from the book, to make the story interesting. I was literally on the edge of my seat for entire segments… It was scary, it was thrilling, it was real, humans were weak, and well, human… I won’t go on and on. But, like the book, the movie takes you to the brink, and leaves you hanging… Apart from that small mishap, the movie is very entertaining, very emotional, and believable. Another very entertaining movie…


© 2003-2009 Ramzi Rizk. proudly powered by Wordpress